Infinity Goods blog

A blog for God’s People

Snow Proves Global Warming

Posted by infinitygoods on January 17, 2008

snow-in-baghdad.jpgWhat’s remarkable is not that it snowed in Baghdad last week — the first time since the 1940s — but the global warming prophets’ reactions to almost unheard-of snow in the desert. To the Al Gores of the world, SNOW in Baghdad PROVES global WARMING.

So, just so we understand what these people are talking about:

  • If it’s hot — it’s global warming;
  • If it’s cold — it’s global warming.

We have to get that through our thick heads. Regardless of the temperature, whether it’s hot or whether it’s cold, it’s global warming.

Now Al Gore even has a Nobel peace prize to PROVE that he knows what he’s talking about, so the rest of us who don’t and remain in disbelief should keep quiet just like our grandparents and great-grandparents kept quiet when Adolph Hitler received his own Nobel peace prize nomination in 1939.

Advertisements

5 Responses to “Snow Proves Global Warming”

  1. Cody said

    I can sense the sarcasm dripping from this post, but snow in Baghdad actually does prove that the average global temperature is rising. As the world as a whole gets warmer, the Northern Hemisphere will actually get colder. It’s all about ocean temperature and ocean currents.

    What a of people don’t realize is that global warming doesn’t mean every place on Earth is going to get warmer. It means average temperatures will go up. It’ll get colder in some places, warmer in others.

  2. Dan Pangburn said

    Climate obviously has changed and will continue to change. The observation that ice is melting does not show that human activity is the cause. The assertion that humans are or ever can have a significant influence on climate by limiting the use of fossil fuel (a.k.a. limiting human production of carbon dioxide) is not supported by any historical record. The only implication that carbon dioxide level has a significant effect on climate comes from huge but still incomplete computer programs that attempt to predict future climate. Avoid the group-think and de facto censorship by Climate Scientists. Directly interrogate official government data that taxpayers have paid for from ORNL and NOAA as follows:

    If the carbon dioxide level from Lawdome, Antarctica http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/co2/lawdome.combined.dat is graphed on the same time scale as fossil fuel usage from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_glob.htm it is discovered that the current carbon dioxide level increase started about 1750, a century before any significant fossil fuel use.

    If average earth temperature since 1880 from http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/anomalies/anomalies.html is graphed on the same time scale as fossil fuel use it is discovered that there is no correlation between rising fossil fuel use and average global temperature at least until 1976.

    The asserted hypothesis that, since 1976, increasing carbon dioxide level has caused the temperature to rise is refuted by the carbon dioxide level from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/vostok.html and earth temperature from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/trends/temp/vostok/vostok.1999.temp.dat determined from the Vostok, Antarctica ice cores. If these are graphed on a higher resolution time scale it is discovered that the change in atmospheric carbon dioxide level lags earth temperature change by hundreds of years.

    If Lawdome and recent carbon dioxide data and Vostok and recent temperature are plotted on the same graph since 1000 AD (or before) it is observed that temperature oscillates up to plus or minus 1.5 degrees Celsius (half pitch about 100 yr) while carbon dioxide level remains essentially unchanged (between 9000BC and 1750AD). This will also show that the average global temperature 200 years ago was about the same as now, 400 years ago was significantly higher than now and current rate of temperature change is fairly typical. Recent measurements show that average earth temperatures in 2006 and 2007 were actually lower than in 1998.

    As shown at http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Reference_Docs/Geocarb_III-Berner.pdf , for most of the history of earth carbon dioxide level has been several times higher than the present.

    The conclusion from all this is that carbon dioxide change does not cause significant climate change. Actions based on the human-caused global warming mistake put American freedom and prosperity at risk.

  3. infinitygoods said

    Cody said “the Northern Hemisphere will actually get colder” and “It means average temperatures will go up. It’ll get colder in some places, warmer in others.”

    So in other words “global warming” is a misnomer. Maybe it should be called “Southern Hemisphere Warming” and “Northern Hemisphere Cooling”?

    If I have this right, north as in North Pole or Alaska will be cold, and south as in South Pacific Islands or South America will be hot. Sounds like business as usual to me. No need for alarm, it’s just mother nature doing the same thing it’s been doing for the last several millennia.

  4. Cody said

    Infinitygoods: It’s not a complete misnomer. As I understand it, average global temperatures will go up, so the globe really is warming, but it’s confusing in that it implies everything will become hotter.

    But yes, this sort of thing is natural. Fear-mongering is the word of the day…

  5. infinitygoods said

    Cody said: “But yes, this sort of thing is natural. Fear-mongering is the word of the day.”

    Glad to see you’re understanding what’s really happening.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: